基业常青 Built to Last 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘

基业常青 Built to Last电子书下载地址
内容简介:
This analysis of what makes great companies great has been hailed everywhere as an instant classic and one of the best business titles since In Search of Excellence。The authors,James C。Collins and Jerry I。 Porras,spent six years in research, and they freely admit that their own preconceptions about business success were devastated by their actual findings--along with the preconceptions of virtually everyone else。
Built to Last identifies 18 “visionary” companies and sets out to determine what's special about them。 To get on the list,a company had to be world famous,have a stellar brand image,and be at least 50 years old。 We're talking about companies that even a layperson knows to be,well,different:the Disneys,the Wal-Marts,the Mercks。
Whatever the key to the success of these companies,the key to the success of this book is that the authors don't waste time comparing them to business failures。Instead,they use a control group of “successful-but-second-rank“ companies to highlight what's special about their 18 “visionary“ picks。Thus Disney is compared to Columbia Pictures,Ford to GM,Hewlett Packard to Texas Instruments, and so on。
The core myth,according to the authors, is that visionary companies must start with a great product and be pushed into the future by charismatic leaders。There are examples of that pattern, they admit:Johnson & Johnson,for one。 But there are also just too many counterexamples--in fact,the majority of the “visionary“ companies,including giants like 3M,Sony,and TI,don't fit the model。 They were characterized by total lack of an initial business plan or key idea and by remarkably self-effacing leaders。 Collins and Porras are much more impressed with something else they shared:an almost cult-like devotion to a “core ideology“ or identity, and active indoctrination of employees into “ideologically commitment“ to the company。
The comparison with the business “B”-team does tend to raise a significant methodological problem:which companies are to be counted as “visionary“ in the first place? There's an air of circularity here,as if you achieve “visionary“ status by,achieving visionary status。So many roads lead to Rome that the book is less practical than it might appear。But that's exactly the point of an eloquent chapter on 3M。 This wildly successful company had no master plan, little structure,and no prima donnas。Instead it had an atmosphere in which bright people were both keen to see the company succeed and unafraid to “try a lot of stuff and keep what works。” --Richard Farr ——This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title。
What makes a visionary company? This book, written by a team from Stanford's Graduate School of Business, compares what the authors have identified as “visionary” companies with selected companies in the same industry。The authors juxtapose Disney and Columbia Pictures, Ford and General Motors, Motorola and Zenith,and Hewlett-Packard and Texas Instruments,to name a few。The visionary companies, the authors found out, had a number of common characteristics; for instance, almost all had some type of core ideology that guided the company in times of upheaval and served as a constant bench mark。 Not all the visionary companies were founded by visionary leaders, however。 On the whole, this is an intriguing book that occasionally provides rare and interesting glimpses into the inner workings and philosophical foundations of successful businesses。 Recommended for all libraries。
书籍目录:
Author’S Note
Acknowledgements
Introduction tO the
Paperback Edition
Preface
Chapter l:The Best 0f the Best
Chapter 2:Clock Building,Not Time Telling
Interlude:No“Tyranny of the OR”
Chapter 3:More Than Profits
Chapter 4:Preserve the Core/Stimulate Progress
Chapter 5:Big Hairy Audacious Goals
Chapter 6:Cult—Like Cultures
Chapter 7:Try a Lot 0f Stuff and Keep WhatWorks
Chapter 8:Home-Grown Management
Chapter 9:Good Enough Never Is
Chapterl0:The End of the Beginning
Chapterll:Building the Vision
Epiogue:Frequently Asked Questions
Appendix 1:Research Issues
Appendix 2:Founding Roots of
Visionary Companies and
Comparison Companies
Appendix3:Tables
Appendix4:Chapter Notes
Index
作者介绍:
暂无相关内容,正在全力查找中
出版社信息:
暂无出版社相关信息,正在全力查找中!
书籍摘录:
暂无相关书籍摘录,正在全力查找中!
在线阅读/听书/购买/PDF下载地址:
原文赏析:
暂无原文赏析,正在全力查找中!
其它内容:
书籍介绍
在线阅读本书
Find out what makes the truly exceptional companies different from other companies. ""Built to Last" . . . is one of the most eye-opening business studies since "In Search of Excellence."--"USA Today."
Publisher Comments:
HarperBusiness Essentials Note from Jim Collins and Jerry Porras,
authors of "Built to Last" As we sat down to write this author's note for the HarperBusiness Essentials edition, "Built to Last" celebrated its sixth year on the Business Week bestseller list. Far beyond what we would have dared to imagine, "Built to Last" has lived up to its own name.
Ironically, we can claim no credit for the title. Creativity often sprouts from frustration, and our editors in 1994 were frustrated in the extreme. We had inserted a clause into our publishing contract that gave us final right of approval, and as the publication date neared, we just kept vetoing titles. In all, something on the order of 127 different options fell by the wayside, from "You are the Competition" to "Research Results on Visionary Companies."
The situation finally escalated to the executive editor for HarperCollins, who went home for the weekend and returned on Monday morning with an idea. "Here," he said, throwing a three by five note card on our editor's desk, "see if they'll go for this." On it he'd written the simple phrase "Built to Last."
And we had our title.
In retrospect, "Built to Last" is a great title, but it is also the wrong title. Not from a marketing standpoint (don't get us wrong, we'd still keep it), but from the standpoint of what this book is really all about. "Built to Last," it turns out, is not fundamentally about building to last. It is about building something that is worthy of lasting — about building a company of such intrinsic excellence that the world would lose something important if that organization ceased to exist. Implicit on every page is a simple question: Why on Earthwould you settle for creating something mediocre that does little more than make money, when you can create something outstanding that makes a lasting contribution as well? And in the end, as the evidence from our research showed, those who make a lasting contribution make more money over the long run anyway.
If we were rewriting "Built to Last" today, we would not overturn any of the basic concepts; they are timeless principles. We certainly know more about great companies than we did in 1994, and there is certainly much that we could add, but our faith in the fundamental findings has not faded. Indeed, we are more convinced than ever that building an enduring great company — one that is truly worthy of lasting — is a noble cause.
Jim Collins and Jerry Porras
March 31, 2002
Synopsis:
Drawing upon a six-year research project at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras took eighteen truly exceptional and long-lasting companies and studied each in direct comparison to one of its top competitors. They examined the companies from their very beginnings to the present day — as start-ups, as midsize companies, and as large corporations. Throughout, the authors asked: "What makes the truly exceptional companies different from the comparison companies and what were the common practices these enduringly great companies followed throughout their history?"
Filled with hundreds of specific examples and organized into a coherent framework of practical concepts that can be applied by managers and entrepreneurs at all levels, Built to Last provides a master blueprint for building organizations that will prosper long into the 21st century and beyond.
From Amazon.com
Built to Last became an instant business classic. This audio abridgement is read by the authors, who alternate chapters. Collins is a bit breathlessly enthusiastic, but clear and interesting; Porras, unfortunately, is poorly inflected and wooden. They set out to determine what's special about "visionary" companies--the Disneys, Wal-Marts, and Mercks, companies at the very top of their game that have demonstrated longevity and great brand image. The authors compare 18 "visionary" picks to a control group of "successful-but-second-rank" companies. Thus Disney is compared to Columbia Pictures, Ford to GM, and so on.
A central myth, according to the authors, is that visionary companies start with a great product and are pushed into the future by charismatic leaders. Usually false, Collins and Porras find. Much more important, and a much more telling line of demarcation between a wild success like 3M and an also-ran like Norton, is flexibility. 3M had no master plan, little structure, and no prima donnas. Instead it had an atmosphere in which bright people were not afraid to "try a lot of stuff and keep what works."
If you listen to this audiocassette on your daily commute, you may discover whether you are headed to a "visionary" place of work--and, if so, whether you are the kind of employee who fits your employer's vision. (Running time: two hours, two cassettes) --Richard Farr
From Library Journal
What makes a visionary company? This book, written by a team from Stanford's Graduate School of Business, compares what the authors have identified as "visionary" companies with selected companies in the same industry. The authors juxtapose Disney and Columbia Pictures, Ford and General Motors, Motorola and Zenith, and Hewlett-Packard and Texas Instruments, to name a few. The visionary companies, the authors found out, had a number of common characteristics; for instance, almost all had some type of core ideology that guided the company in times of upheaval and served as a constant bench mark. Not all the visionary companies were founded by visionary leaders, however. On the whole, this is an intriguing book that occasionally provides rare and interesting glimpses into the inner workings and philosophical foundations of successful businesses. Recommended for all libraries.
Randy L. Abbott, Univ. of Evansville Lib., Ind.
Book Dimension
Height (mm) 204 Width (mm) 134
点击链接进入中文版:
基业长青(珍藏版)
网站评分
书籍多样性:9分
书籍信息完全性:3分
网站更新速度:9分
使用便利性:9分
书籍清晰度:7分
书籍格式兼容性:7分
是否包含广告:3分
加载速度:3分
安全性:7分
稳定性:8分
搜索功能:4分
下载便捷性:4分
下载点评
- 收费(321+)
- 种类多(233+)
- 差评少(512+)
- 全格式(366+)
- 服务好(103+)
- 博大精深(478+)
- 微信读书(74+)
- 实惠(673+)
- txt(234+)
- 速度快(400+)
- 经典(364+)
- 可以购买(102+)
下载评价
- 网友 融***华:
下载速度还可以
- 网友 田***珊:
可以就是有些书搜不到
- 网友 石***烟:
还可以吧,毕竟也是要成本的,付费应该的,更何况下载速度还挺快的
- 网友 寿***芳:
可以在线转化哦
- 网友 堵***洁:
好用,支持
- 网友 相***儿:
你要的这里都能找到哦!!!
- 网友 饶***丽:
下载方式特简单,一直点就好了。
- 网友 温***欣:
可以可以可以
- 网友 曾***玉:
直接选择epub/azw3/mobi就可以了,然后导入微信读书,体验百分百!!!
- 网友 訾***雰:
下载速度很快,我选择的是epub格式
- 网友 堵***格:
OK,还可以
- 网友 谭***然:
如果不要钱就好了
- 网友 戈***玉:
特别棒
喜欢"基业常青 Built to Last"的人也看了
增广贤文·格言联璧诵读本 升级版 中华书局 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
新疆 《走遍中国》编辑部 中国旅游出版社【无忧售后 正版图书】 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
无线光通信 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
新英汉汉英词典(修订版) 商务印书馆国际有限公司 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
公共建筑设计(第4版) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
羊皮卷 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
中文版Access2007实例与操作 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
欧美哲学通史:现代哲学卷 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
象棋实战训练30天(中级) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
现代高尔夫俱乐部经营与管理 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 环艺手绘表现图技法 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 书虫.牛津英汉双语读物 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 中国金融科技发展报告(2019) 2019版 社会科学文献出版社 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 建设法规(第2版) 张爱云,陈明军 主编 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 高血压病用药知识 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 9787518005819 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 英语高级口译证书实考试卷汇编(2014~2017) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 挣脱母爱的束缚 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 公共基础知识 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 数学物理方程(第2版) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
书籍真实打分
故事情节:5分
人物塑造:6分
主题深度:9分
文字风格:6分
语言运用:4分
文笔流畅:5分
思想传递:7分
知识深度:4分
知识广度:9分
实用性:7分
章节划分:6分
结构布局:3分
新颖与独特:8分
情感共鸣:8分
引人入胜:4分
现实相关:6分
沉浸感:5分
事实准确性:6分
文化贡献:8分