Consider the Lobster 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘

Consider the Lobster电子书下载地址
内容简介:
Do lobsters feel pain? Did Franz Kafka have a funny bone? What is John Updike's deal, anyway? And what happens when adult video starlets meet their fans in person? David Foster Wallace answers these questions and more in essays that are also enthralling narrative adventures. Whether covering the three-ring circus of a vicious presidential race, plunging into the wars between dictionary writers, or confronting the World's Largest Lobster Cooker at the annual Maine Lobster Festival, Wallace projects a quality of thought that is uniquely his and a voice as powerful and distinct as any in American letters.
书籍目录:
暂无相关目录,正在全力查找中!
作者介绍:
暂无相关内容,正在全力查找中
出版社信息:
暂无出版社相关信息,正在全力查找中!
书籍摘录:
暂无相关书籍摘录,正在全力查找中!
在线阅读/听书/购买/PDF下载地址:
原文赏析:
** Am I a good person? Deep down, do I even really want to be a good person, or do I only want to seem like a good person so that people (including myself) will approve of me? Is there a difference? How do I ever actually know whether I’m bullshitting myself, morally speaking? **
** What exactly does “faith” mean? As in “religious faith,” “faith in God,” etc. Isn’t it basically crazy to believe in something that there’s no proof of? Is there really any difference between what we call faith and some primitive tribe’s sacrificing virgins to volcanoes because they believe it’ll produce good weather? How can somebody have faith before he’s presented with sufficient reason to have faith? Or is somehow needing to have faith a sufficient reason for having faith? But then what kind of need are ...
As a practical matter, I strongly doubt whether a guy who has four small kids and makes $12,000 a year feels more empowered or less ill-used by a society that carefully refers to him as "economically disadvantaged" rather than "poor." Where I he, in fact, I'd probably find the Politically Correct English (PCE) term insulting -- not just because it's patronizing (which it is ) but because it's hypocritical and self-serving in a way that oft-patronized people tend to have really good subliminal antennae for. The basic hypocrisy about usages like "economically disadvantaged" and "differently abled" is that PCE advocates believe that beneficiaries of these terms' compassion and generosity to be poor people and people in wheelchairs, which again omits something that everyone knows but nobody ex...
Helping [most college writers] eliminate the [most persistent and damaging error] involves drumming into student writers two big injunctions: (1) Do not presume that the reader can read your mind -- anything that you want the reader to visualize or consider or conclude, you must provide; (2) Do not presume that the reader feels the same way that you do about a given experience or issue -- your argument cannot just assume as true the very things you're trying to argue for.
Because (1) and (2) seem so simple and obvious, it may surprise you to know that they are actually incredibly hard to get students to understand in such a way that the principles inform their writing. The reason for the difficulty is that, in the abstract (1) and (2) are intellectual, whereas in practice they are more th...
He and Hecuba ended up over coffee, and when H.H. finally cleared his throat and asked the cop why such an obviously decent fellow squarely on the side of the law and civic virtue was a porn fan, the detective confessed that what drew him to the films was “the faces,” i.e. the actresses’ faces, i.e. those rare moments in orgasm or accidental tenderness when the starlets dropped their stylized “fuck-me-I’m-a-nasty-girl” sneer and became, suddenly, real people. “Sometimes—and you never know when, is the thing—sometimes all of a sudden they’ll kind of reveal themselves” was the detective’s way of putting it. “Their what-do-you-call … humanness.” It turned out the LAPD detective found adult films moving, in fact far more so than most mainstream Hollywood movies, in which latter films actors—so...
It’s very easy to gloss over the PoW thing, partly because we’ve heard so much about it and partly because it’s so off the charts dramatic, like something in a movie instead of a man’s life. But it’s worth considering for a moment, because it’s what makes McCain’s “causes greater than self-interest” line easier to hear.
You probably already know what happened. In October of ‘67 McCain was himself still a Young Voter and flying his 23rd Vietnam combat mission and his A-4 Skyhawk plane got shot down over Hanoi and he had to eject, which basically means setting off an explosive charge that blows your seat out of the plane, which ejection broke both of McCain’s arms and one leg and gave him a concussion and he started falling out of the skies over Hanoi.
Try to imagine how much this would ...
But if you, like poor old Rolling Stone, have come to a point on the Trail where you've started fearing your own cynicism almost as much as you fear your own credulity and the salesmen who feed on it, you may find your thoughts returning again and again to a certain dark and box-sized cell in a certain Hilton half a world and three careers away, to the torture and fear and offer of release and a certain Young Voter named McCain's refusal to violate a Code. There were no techs' cameras in that box, no aides or consultants, no paradoxes or gray areas; nothing to sell. There was just one guy and whatever in his character sustained him. This is a huge deal. In your mind, that Hoa Lo box becomes sort of a special dressing room with a star on the door, the private place behind the stage where on...
其它内容:
书籍介绍
Do lobsters feel pain? Did Franz Kafka have a funny bone? What is John Updike's deal, anyway? And what happens when adult video starlets meet their fans in person? David Foster Wallace answers these questions and more in essays that are also enthralling narrative adventures. Whether covering the three-ring circus of a vicious presidential race, plunging into the wars between dictionary writers, or confronting the World's Largest Lobster Cooker at the annual Maine Lobster Festival, Wallace projects a quality of thought that is uniquely his and a voice as powerful and distinct as any in American letters.
网站评分
书籍多样性:5分
书籍信息完全性:4分
网站更新速度:7分
使用便利性:3分
书籍清晰度:5分
书籍格式兼容性:3分
是否包含广告:7分
加载速度:6分
安全性:5分
稳定性:8分
搜索功能:5分
下载便捷性:9分
下载点评
- 不亏(126+)
- 排版满分(109+)
- 好评(96+)
- 体验满分(664+)
- 小说多(338+)
- 无缺页(658+)
- 推荐购买(503+)
- 少量广告(619+)
- 图文清晰(544+)
- 经典(676+)
- 下载快(155+)
- azw3(640+)
- 字体合适(357+)
下载评价
- 网友 养***秋:
我是新来的考古学家
- 网友 仰***兰:
喜欢!很棒!!超级推荐!
- 网友 沈***松:
挺好的,不错
- 网友 后***之:
强烈推荐!无论下载速度还是书籍内容都没话说 真的很良心!
- 网友 焦***山:
不错。。。。。
- 网友 石***致:
挺实用的,给个赞!希望越来越好,一直支持。
- 网友 益***琴:
好书都要花钱,如果要学习,建议买实体书;如果只是娱乐,看看这个网站,对你来说,是很好的选择。
- 网友 冯***卉:
听说内置一千多万的书籍,不知道真假的
- 网友 陈***秋:
不错,图文清晰,无错版,可以入手。
- 网友 堵***格:
OK,还可以
- 网友 孙***夏:
中评,比上不足比下有余
- 网友 薛***玉:
就是我想要的!!!
- 网友 孔***旋:
很好。顶一个希望越来越好,一直支持。
- 网友 冷***洁:
不错,用着很方便
- 网友 师***怡:
说的好不如用的好,真心很好。越来越完美
喜欢"Consider the Lobster"的人也看了
民主与本土文化 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
西游记(中国四大名著)(精)/名家文丛 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
时运变迁 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
实验班提优大考卷:语文(五年级上 RMJY) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
开心学堂二年级(一季度) 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
成功的燃料 [美]维斯·比维斯【正版书籍】 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
9787511333803 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
中央企业履行社会责任报告 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
贞观政要译注 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
2020新版 手绘中国历史地图绘本系列人文版8-9-10-12岁历史地理课外阅读书目透过地图看中国各朝代历史地理讲述中国简史 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 最好的朋友:如何建立和维护友谊 化学工业出版社 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 中日对照商务书信大全 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 探索发现/拉鲁斯少儿百科丛书 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 编辑人的世界 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 社会保障制度史 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 9787312032998 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 92种元素组成神奇宇宙 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 2020华研外语·考研英语完形填空100篇 强化词汇基础全文翻译超详解 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 契诃夫短篇小说选 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
- 2012最新版 妇产科学副主任医师 主任医师职称考试习题集 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘
书籍真实打分
故事情节:3分
人物塑造:7分
主题深度:6分
文字风格:5分
语言运用:8分
文笔流畅:3分
思想传递:5分
知识深度:7分
知识广度:9分
实用性:3分
章节划分:3分
结构布局:6分
新颖与独特:9分
情感共鸣:9分
引人入胜:7分
现实相关:6分
沉浸感:3分
事实准确性:8分
文化贡献:9分