Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金 2025 chm pdf kindle rb azw3 下载 115盘

Ronald Dworkin occupies a distinctive place in both public life and philosophy. In public life, he is a regular contributor to The New York Review of Books and other widely read journals. In philosophy, he has written important and influential works on many of the most prominent issues in legal and political philosophy. In both cases, his interventions have in part shaped the debates he joined. His opposition to Robert Bork's nomination for the United States Supreme Court gave new centrality to debates about the public role of judges and the role of original intent in constitutional interpretation. His writings in legal philosophy have reoriented the modern debate about legal positivism and natural law. In political philosophy, he has shaped the ways in which people debate the nature of equality and has reframed debates about the sanctity of life.

Contributors page

Introduction: Anti-Archimedeanism

ARTHUR RIPSTEIN

1 The “Hart–Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed

2 The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle

3 Liberty and Equality

4 Rights, Responsibilities, and Reflections on the Sanctity of Life

5 Hercules, Abraham Lincoln, the United States Constitution, and the Problem of Slavery

Bibliography

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线阅读

在线听书地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线收听

在线购买地址：Ronald Dworkin罗纳德·德沃金在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

作者介绍：Arthur Ripstein

Arthur Ripstein is professor of law and philosophy at the University of Toronto. An associate editor of Philosophy & Public Affairs, he is the author of Equality, Responsibility and the Law and Practical Rationality and Preference.

书籍介绍

Ronald Dworkin occupies a distinctive place in both public life and philosophy. In public life, he is a regular contributor to The New York Review of Books and other widely read journals. In philosophy, he has written important and influential works on many of the most prominent issues in legal and political philosophy. In both cases, his interventions have in part shaped the debates he joined. His opposition to Robert Bork's nomination for the United States Supreme Court gave new centrality to debates about the public role of judges and the role of original intent in constitutional interpretation. His writings in legal philosophy have reoriented the modern debate about legal positivism and natural law. In political philosophy, he has shaped the ways in which people debate the nature of equality and has reframed debates about the sanctity of life.